Wednesday, 6 April 2016

The God of Small Things

This is an excerpt from The God of Small Things by Arundhati Roy, her first and only work in fiction. Roy creates a new language of expression, the kind that norms of writing usually don't afford us. She wouldn't care she's writing in English; if there is a thought in Malayalam, she will express it as such. Anyway, this and much more makes it my favourite book of all time. This excerpt is about a character called Estha which is particularly close to my heart. Hope you can appreciate despite the absence of all context.

"Estha had always been a quiet child, so no one could pinpoint with any degree of accuracy exactly when (the year, if not the month or day) he had stopped talking. Stopped talking altogether, that is. The fact is that there wasn’t an “exactly when.” It had been a gradual winding down and closing shop. A barely noticeable quietening. As though he had simply run out of conversation and had nothing left to say. Yet Estha’s silence was never awkward. Never intrusive. Never noisy. It wasn’t an accusing, protesting silence as much as a sort of aestivation, a dormancy, the psychological equivalent of what lungfish do to get themselves through the dry season, except that in Estha’s case the dry season looked as though it would last forever. 
Over time he had acquired the ability to blend into the background of wherever he was—into bookshelves, gardens, curtains, doorways, streets—to appear inanimate, almost invisible to the untrained eye. It usually took strangers a while to notice him even when they were in the same room with him. It took them even longer to notice that he never spoke. Some never noticed at all. 
Estha occupied very little space in the world." 

Tuesday, 5 April 2016

Women in Science

3 things:

1. A painfully shy woman of Austrian descent comes to work unpaid for the eminent chemist Otto Hahn in Berlin's Kaiser Wilhelm Institute in 1912. The two collaborate for over thirty years studying radioactivity, despite her exile from a Nazi Germany because she was a Jew. Her insight is key in the discovery of the phenomenon of nuclear fission. In 1945, the Nobel Prize in Chemistry is awarded to Hahn, while she isn't heard of.

2. In 1951, a woman begins working as a research assistant in the biophysics unit of King's College, London where she uses her expertise in X-Ray diffraction techniques to study DNA. She exposes herself to over 100 hours of radiations (a fact that led to her death from ovarian cancer in 1958) and finally manages to obtain one 'Photograph 51' which is critical in helping James Watson and Francis Crick correctly identify the double helical structure of DNA (the photograph was disclosed to them by a colleague of the woman, without her permission). In 1962, the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences awards Watson and Crick the Nobel Prize in Medicine, while she is conveniently forgotten.

Photograph 51

3. A bright and talented woman works on her thesis in Radio Astronomy at the University of Cambridge. On the particularly chilly morning of 21 December 1967, she finds four equally spaced "blips" or pulses in her data, thereby confirming the existence of neutron stars called pulsars, a feat regarded by many as one of the most fascinating discoveries in astronomy in the 20th century. For her contributions, Antony Hewish shares the 1974 Nobel Prize in Physics with one other.

These women are Lise Meitner, Rosalind Franklin and Jocelyn Bell Burnell and I did not name them above purposely.

I have always dismissed things like gender inequality because in my mind, even acknowledging that women are considered inferior to men by many in our society, lent some credibility to the notion. Reading the stories of these three women (especially Jocelyn Burnell who is still alive) made me rethink all that.

For me the idea of gender inequality is so ridiculous I didn't even see the need of listening to the people who didn't share this opinion (or as I considered it, fact). But maybe that isn't always helpful. Like the thing we did with Donald Trump. The idea of his presidency was so insane to even consider, that we forgot to dismiss it. And here he is now winning state after state.

So as painful as this might be, maybe sometimes we do need to stand up for our opinions that we consider to be natural truths. Because the other side might consider theirs that, too.